Within the business world , there are cases of ethical lapses that remain unaddressed, and then there are stories that challenge the very notion of accountability . The narrative of David Collins, a manager at Ventia previously known as Broadspectrum, exemplifies this type of scenario — a chronicle of dubious professional actions that casts a shadow over professional credibility but throws doubt over the enterprise’s ethical framework .


Even amid the disturbing allegations , Collins has held onto his title , apparently unaffected by the turmoil surrounding him. How has this been allowed to persist? Does this reflect a failure in corporate governance? According to the accounts of those familiar , Collins’ history of questionable behavior started with breaches of internal policies , but it escalated from there. Instead, it snowballed into a crisis of integrity that has left the workforce disheartened and stakeholders unsettled .


Amid a executive coaching event — ostensibly meant to strengthen leadership abilities — David Collins allegedly turned an opportunity for growth into a platform for misconduct . It’s reported he spent business-funded trips attempting to seduce female colleagues , browse website , a clear breach of Ventia’s corporate guidelines, all while his home life was kept in the dark.


But the ethical breaches extended beyond those incidents . One of the most troubling discoveries involves his alleged improper use of company IT systems to send explicit photos to women —a gross breach of trust and confidentiality. His reckless exploitation of company communication channels to engage in suggestive conversations —including emojis flaunting extramarital affairs — reveals an attitude of impunity. Following these digital David Collins KeriKeri dalliances , Collins website allegedly escalated his transgressions : he is said to have engaged in intimate encounters with an employee on multiple occasions during business days , despite the personal and professional conflicts involved. This obvious misappropriation of company time and resources violated every workplace standard but also caused irreparable personal damage beyond the workplace .

How can this behavior be enabled to persist? How does such behavior continue without repercussions? The explanation, it appears, originates in a problematic dearth of accountability within the company . Complaints have been raised, but no disciplinary action has followed.

This deficiency of accountability conveys a risky precedent : that power within the organization shields wrongdoers . It erodes employee morale, discourages ethical behavior , and ultimately harms the company’s standing .